spacerThe University of California, Irvinespacer Grunigen Medical Library
Langson LibraryScience LibraryUCI Librariesspacer
spacer
 

EBM Guidebook

Table of Contents

    Title Page
  1. Introduction
  2. STEP 1: Formulating the Question
    1. POEM
    2. PICO
  3. STEP 2: Finding the Best Evidence
  4. STEP 3: Appraising the Evidence
    1. CAMeL General Steps
    2. CAMeL Critical Appraisal Protocols
      1. Therapy
      2. Diagnostic Tests
      3. Review Articles
      4. Screening Tests
      5. Prognosis
      6. Causation
  5. STEP 4: Preparing an EBM Presentation
    1. Protocol for the Presentation
    2. Sample Presentation
  6. Overview of Statistics
    1. Statistics Without Statistics
    2. Ten Ways to Cheat
  7. Glossary of Terms
    Terms marked with an asterisk (*)
    are defined in the Glossary.
  8. References
Back to Informatics & EBM Instruction page  Back to Evidence-Based Instruction page

V.  STEP 4: Preparing an EBM presentation

  1. Protocol for the Presentation
    The following is a general protocol that should be applied to a critical appraisal of the medical literature session (CAMeL Session). Use this protocol when you are presenting on rounds, in case-conferences or journal club. Adjust the length and intensity of the session appropriately.
  1. Define the question using the protocol described in Section II, Formulating the Question.
  2. Describe in detail the search technique you used to find the evidence, the search engine you used, or your choice of materials to answer the question.
  3. State the research objectives of the evidence that you found.
  4. Characterize the article itself by identifying:
  1. The source of the data: *primary (original) versus *secondary
  2. The research design: Descriptive, Case-Control, RCT, Review
  3. The journal type
  4. Authors
  5. Sites
  6. Patients
  7. A specific description of the methods, statistics, and protocol for the study
  8. End points
  9. Results
  10. Authors’ conclusions
  1. Assess the research methodology and validity of the report based upon the tools for critical appraisal, which have been provided in the guide for specific categories of articles.
  2. Briefly review any editorial comments and letters to the editor concerning the article you have selected.
Back   -15-   Next
Get PDF  Right click to download PDF file
spacer
National Network of Libraries of Medicine
spacer
Grunigen Medical Library · 101 The City Drive · Orange, CA 92868 · 714.456.5585
© Copyright 2004 The Regents of the University of California. All Rights Reserved.
Last modified:  February 7, 2008
Contact the Web Manager : Privacy Statement
spacer
UCI seal